Corrections & Editorial Standards

Corrections & Editorial Standards

Our commitment is absolute accuracy. When we fall short, we correct the record clearly and promptly.
This page explains how we verify facts, how to request a correction, who makes editorial decisions,
and how we fund our work.

3 Narratives News • Updated

Corrections Policy

Accuracy is our first obligation. If we publish an error, we fix it promptly and visibly.

How to Request a Correction

Email [email protected] with:

  • Article URL and headline
  • The exact passage to review (copy/paste)
  • Your proposed correction and supporting source(s)

We review every request. If a correction or clarification is warranted, we will update the story and add a note.

How We Correct

  • Correction — a factual error is fixed; we add a dated note at the top or bottom of the article.
  • Clarification — accurate but potentially misleading wording is refined; a note explains what changed.
  • Update — new material is added to advance the story; we timestamp the update.

We maintain a simple log of material corrections for accountability.

Editorial independence: Editorial decisions are made by the newsroom. Corrections are never negotiated with sources, sponsors, or advertisers.

Editorial Standards

Our newsroom follows a clear, replicable recipe to minimize bias and show our work.

  • Two sides, minimum: Major stories present at least two credible narratives, written fully from within each perspective, plus an overlooked “silent story.”
  • Sources you can verify: We link to primary documents (transcripts, filings, datasets) and reputable outlets such as
    Reuters,
    AP, and
    BBC.
  • Fact-check pass: Dates, quotes, names, and numbers are verified before publish; charged labels are attributed to speakers.
  • Updates & context: We timestamp meaningful updates and avoid stealth edits.
  • Reader agency: We invite readers to weigh both narratives and form their own third view.

See also: About 3 Narratives News

Our Team

Editor-in-Chief

Carlos Taylhardat — oversees editorial priorities, final reviews, and corrections approvals. Author profile

Senior Editor

3N Editorial Desk — verifies sourcing, balance across narratives, and adherence to publishing principles.

Freelance and guest contributors are edited to 3N standards and disclose conflicts before assignment.

Ownership & Funding

3 Narratives News is independently owned and operated by Carlos Taylhardat. Political parties or advocacy groups do not fund us. 

  • Revenue: Reader support, advertising, and ethical sponsorships.
  • Labeling: Sponsored content—if any—is clearly labelled. Editorial and business decisions remain separate.
  • Transparency: We accept no hidden funding; financial support is limited to transparent reader contributions, ethical advertising, and clearly labelled sponsorships.

Contact & Tips

General

Email: [email protected]
Tips: [email protected]

We read every message and give priority to submissions that include URLs, documents, or verifiable sources.

Corrections

Subject line: “Correction Request”
Include the URL, quoted passage, and proposed fix with sources.

We aim to respond within 48 hours on business days.

AI Use Policy (llms.txt)

We publish an AI permissions file for model crawlers.
See llms.txt for our current access and attribution rules.
All reporting is human-led. AI tools may assist with research or formatting, but editorial judgment always rests with our editors.

1. Purpose and Principles

At 3 Narratives News (3N), every article begins with one rule: facts first, interpretation second.
We believe journalism in the 21st century requires both human judgment and advanced technology.
Our fact-checking process combines human editorial oversight with AI-assisted research to test the accuracy, fairness,
and completeness of every published piece.

We follow the ethical codes of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) and the Trust Project for Transparency.

2. Our Verification Process

  1. Source Verification — Every factual claim must be supported by at least two independent, reputable sources (official documents, academic papers, verified newswires, or direct eyewitness accounts).
  2. Primary Data First — Whenever possible, reporters and researchers review original datasets, court filings, legislation, or transcripts.
  3. AI-Assisted Research — ChatGPT is used to surface, summarize, and cross-reference primary information; all findings are reviewed and confirmed by a human editor before publication.
  4. Cross-Narrative Review — Each article presents at least two credible narratives from opposing perspectives, followed by “The Silent Story” section exploring the human or systemic truth beneath both.
  5. Quote Validation — Direct quotations are verified against recordings, transcripts, or published statements.
  6. Date and Context Checks — We confirm timelines, image authenticity, and geographic details using open-source tools (e.g., Google Earth, InVID).

3. Use of Artificial Intelligence

AI tools assist our journalists by:

  • identifying contradictions or missing sources,
  • testing statistical claims for plausibility,
  • suggesting alternative angles for balance, and
  • drafting summaries for editorial review.

AI never publishes independently. All outputs are reviewed, edited, and approved by a human editor.
Each article is the result of collaboration between Carlos Taylhardat and ChatGPT AI-assisted research
under the supervision of our editorial standards team.

We view AI collaboration as a natural evolution of journalistic method — a way to improve accuracy and reduce human bias while retaining accountability.

4. Editorial Oversight and Accountability

  • All final publishing decisions are made by the Editor-in-Chief (human).
  • Every story undergoes a minimum two-step review: content verification and narrative balance assessment.
  • Controversial topics receive an additional editorial roundtable before publication.

5. Corrections Mechanics

  1. Transparency — When an error is identified, we correct it as quickly as possible and note the change at the bottom of the article.
  2. Correction FormatCorrection [Date]: We stated [X]; it should have read [Y].
  3. Archival Integrity — The original error is never deleted from our records; it is logged in our public Corrections Log.
  4. Notification — Substantial corrections are announced via our official X (@3NarrativesNews) feed and newsletter.
  5. Reader Participation — Readers can report possible errors by emailing [email protected] with the subject “Correction.” Include the URL and supporting evidence.

6. Corrections Log (Latest Updates)

Date Article Correction Editor
–September 11th, 2025 /charlie-rose-assassinated-a-father-a-son-a-voice-silenced –It was supposed to be Charlie Kirk and Charlie Rose –Page links to the Charlie Kirk page.
Date Article Correction Editor
–October 14th, 2025

/who-rules-gazas-rubble/
–The wrong address was produced –Article follows a 301 re-direct

7. Attribution and Sourcing

  • We credit original reporting with clear citations and links.
  • Anonymous sources are used only when information is verified and the source’s safety is at risk.
  • AI outputs are never used as anonymous sources; they serve as research assistants and idea generators.

8. Conflict of Interest Policy

Reporters and editors must disclose any personal, financial, or political interest related to their coverage. Such stories undergo independent review before approval.

9. Reader Engagement and Right of Reply

We encourage subject-matter experts and readers to submit clarifications or counter-evidence. Substantive responses may be featured in follow-up articles or letters to the editor.

10. Contact Information

Corrections & Editorial Integrity Desk
Email: [email protected]
Mail: 3 Narratives News, Vancouver BC, Canada

11. Commitment to Continuous Improvement

We review this policy twice per year as AI and journalistic technologies evolve. Our goal is to remain a model of transparency, accountability, and ethical human-AI collaboration in news media.

✅ Key Takeaway

Every story at 3 Narratives News is a partnership between human judgment and machine precision. The result is a new standard for trust — one built on verifiable facts, open correction, and empathy for every side of a story.

FAQ (Corrections & Sourcing)

How fast do you correct errors?

Material errors are prioritized immediately; our goal is to update and note within 48 business hours or sooner.

How can I submit documents or data?

Send links or attachments to [email protected]. We cannot guarantee coverage but review all submissions.

Do you remove articles?

We do not remove accurate stories. In rare cases where safety or legal obligations require redaction, we note the change.