Carlos Taylhardat | 3 Narratives News | September 25, 2025
“Your countries are going to hell.”
Donald Trump told the General Assembly this week, a line that cut through the pomp of the UN’s 80th anniversary. The world’s leaders gathered not in triumph but in unease, confronting wars, climate breakdown, and a system struggling to prove its worth.
80 Years On
Founded in 1945 after the ashes of World War II, the United Nations was built on a promise: to prevent another global catastrophe. Eight decades later, the UN remains a stage for power, critique, and moral appeal. At this milestone, speeches revealed both the fractures in the system and the urgency of its survival.
Narrative One: Trump’s Scathing Rebuke
Former U.S. President Donald Trump used the anniversary to deliver a blistering critique. He called the UN “feckless, corrupt and pernicious,” urging nations to close their borders and reclaim sovereignty. He mocked climate action as a “con job” and scolded Europe for buying Russian energy even as war burns in Ukraine (The Guardian).
His message? Multilateralism has failed; nations should look inward. For a fuller breakdown of his speech and its implications, see our analysis: Trump’s 80th-Anniversary Lecture to the UN.
Narrative Two: Jordan’s Moral Reckoning
King Abdullah II of Jordan turned the spotlight on Gaza, calling it:
“One of the darkest moments in this institution’s history.”
He said Israel can no longer claim to be a credible peace partner and warned that failure to act risks fueling a wider regional conflagration (Times of Israel).
His words cut through diplomacy’s careful tones, insisting that the UN faces a moral test: whether to stand with human suffering or bureaucratic paralysis.
Narrative Three: Other Voices, Other Truths
Two other moments stood out during the commemorations:
- Secretary-General António Guterres called for recommitment to the UN Charter, highlighting peacekeeping, human rights treaties, and climate action, while admitting that enforcement lags far behind ideals.
- Small island states pressed the urgency of climate survival, warning that entire nations may disappear under rising seas if the UN remains paralyzed.
These quieter interventions may not grab headlines but represent the silent fractures of multilateralism — where the most vulnerable face existential threats with few tools for survival.
What Have We Learned?
From Rwanda to Gaza, from the Congo to Ukraine, the UN has shown us both its importance and its fragility. Its greatest achievements lie in setting norms, not enforcing them. Its greatest failures: when those norms collapse under the weight of power politics.
- Sovereignty vs. Solidarity — the enduring tension.
- Legitimacy is fragile when resolutions carry no teeth.
- New threats — AI, pandemics, cyberwar — demand new governance.
Hypothesis: The Next 80 Years
- Scenario A — Reinvention: The UN reforms into a leaner, digital, enforcement-capable body with binding treaties on climate, AI, and security.
- Scenario B — Fragmentation: States abandon the UN for regional blocs and bilateral deals, leaving the institution symbolic but hollow.
- Scenario C — Collapse & Rebirth: A major crisis — a world war, climate catastrophe, or systemic collapse — forces a rebirth of multilateralism in a new form.
Our hope: that humanity stumbles into Scenario A — reform before disaster — rather than after. Because in the next eighty years, the cost of failure could be existential.
The Silent Story: Who Pays?
Lost in the grandeur are the people — refugees, stateless, climate-displaced, the voiceless in forgotten wars. The UN was founded in their name:
“We the Peoples.”
Yet their voices remain faint in the marble halls.
Key Takeaways
- Trump blasted the UN as obsolete, urging sovereignty over solidarity.
- King Abdullah II framed Gaza as a moral crisis for the institution.
- Guterres and small states demanded recommitment, especially on climate.
- The UN’s future hangs between reform, fragmentation, or collapse.
- The true measure is whether the vulnerable are protected — or ignored.
Questions This Article Answers
- What were the main highlights of the UN’s 80th anniversary speeches?
- How did Donald Trump and King Abdullah II frame their critiques?
- What role did smaller states and the Secretary-General play?
- What lessons has the UN offered in its first 80 years?
- What are the plausible futures for the UN over the next 80 years?
- Survivors at Sea: What the Caribbean Strike Reveals
- The President or the Cartel: Trump’s Shadow War in Venezuela
- Winter Without Heat: Russia Targets Ukraine’s Gas Lifeline
- Aid In, Trust Out: Gaza’s Ceasefire Stumbles Over Hostage Remains
- Who Rules Gaza’s Rubble? The Battle to Rebuild After the Ceasefire
Thanks for sharing your latest post! I took a look at the article on your site, “Eighty Years of the United Nations: Confrontation, Crisis, & the Quiet Hope for What Comes Next.” It’s a thoughtful piece on the UN’s historical role, current challenges, and potential future paths. The analysis of its founding context, the evolving global landscape, and the call for a reformed or reimagined multilateral system is compelling. I particularly appreciated the balance between critiquing the UN’s limitations and acknowledging its quiet successes, like humanitarian work.
Haha, so the UNs 80th birthday partys theme seems to be Realistic Expectations. Trumps So youre obsolete? was great, King Abdullahs Gaza call-to-arms was the highlight, and Guterres admitted the enforcement teams still on a coffee break. The article presents a comical three-act play: Act One, the US walks out (again), Act Two, the King yells Cut! at the hypocrisy, Act Three, everyone else whispers Pass the popcorn. The Hypothesis section is pure farce – either the UN gets a reality check and reforms, splits up like a bad relationship, or the world ends and we finally have an excuse to skip the meeting. My guess? The UN will survive, mostly because collapsing would require actual work, which is UN-efficient. Lets just hope they manage Scenario A before the coffee supply runs out.
That is a good way of looking at it. But the drama continues, we just heard from the Palestinian leader and now its Israel’s turn.